When to Use a Private Constructor | TypeScript OOP

Last updated Nov 21st, 2019

In this blog post, I explain how using a private constructor helps to force a single way to create an object, and why it's most commonly used with the Factory Pattern.

One of the first things we learn when we start out is how to create instances of objects. Typically, we do this with the new keyword.

class User {
  public name: string;

  constructor (name: string) {
    this.name = name;
  }
}

const user: User = new User('Khalil Stemmler');

The actual thing that does the creating is the constructor- and by default, it's public.

Have you ever seen a private constructor? Changing the scope of a constructor to private removes our ability to use the new keyword.

class User {
  public name: string;

  private constructor (name: string) {
    this.name = name;
  }
}

const user: User = new User('Khalil Stemmler');  // Error

Why on Earth would you want to do that? We can't create instances anymore. How are we supposed to get Users out of this class now?

All is not lost, and it turns out that there is a very good reason for why you'd want to do this kind of thing.

In essence, it's to enforce object creation rules.

Using the new keyword

When we use the new keyword, there's not really an elegant way to prevent a User from being created if certain validation rules don't pass.

We can throw errors.

class User {
  public name: string;

  constructor (name: string) {
    if (!!name === false) {
      throw new  Error ("Ya need to include a name")
    }

    this.name = name;
  }
}

let user;

try {
  user = new User();
} catch (err) {

} 

console.log(user); // undefined

But honestly, who wants to live in a world where we can't trust that a simple new statement won't throw errors. I don't feel like adopting trust issues with my codebase.

We've talked about why throwing errors is not great in the "Functional Error Handling" article, so let's think of a better way to prevent bad objects from being created.

Static factory methods

The best way to enforce validation logic against a domain object is to keep the constructor private and use a static factory method to enforce the constraints.

Using the Result<T> class from "Flexible Error Handling w/ the Result Class | Enterprise Node.js + TypeScript", we can statically represent a success or a failure.

interface UserProps {
  name: string;
}

class User {
  private props: UserProps;

  get name (): string {
    return this.props.name;
  }

  private constructor (props: UserProps) {
    this.props = props;
  }

  public static create (props: UserProps): Result<User> {
    const guardResult = Guard.againstNullOrUndefined(props.name, 'name');
    const isAppropriateLength = TextUtils.isAtLeast(2, props.name) 
      && TextUtils.isAtMost(31, props.name);

    // Fail with reason
    if (!guardResult.success) {
      return Result.fail<User>(guardResult.message)
    }

    // Fail with reason
    if (!isAppropriateLength) {
      return Result.fail<User>("Must be between 2 and 31 characters")
    }

    // Static method can access the constructor
    return Result.ok<User>(new User(props));
  }
}

Now, object creation looks like this:

let user: User;
let userOrError: Result<User> = User.create({ name: 'Khalil Stemmler' });

if (userOrError.isSuccess) {
  user = userOrError.getValue();
} else {
  console.log(userOrError.error)
}

Feel free to get even more functional with these different types of errors as well. We can statically type a NullValue error and an InvalidLength error.

Using the Either<T, U> monad from "Functional Error Handling with Express.js and DDD | Enterprise Node.js + TypeScript", we can build return types like:

type UserResult = Either<
  // Failure types
  UserErrors.NullValuesError |
  UserErrors.InvalidFieldLengthError,
  // Success type
  User
>

Discussion

Liked this? Sing it loud and proud 👨‍🎤.

0 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment

Submit

Stay in touch!

About the author

Khalil Stemmler,
Developer Advocate @ Apollo GraphQL ⚡

Khalil is a software developer, writer, and musician. He frequently publishes articles about Domain-Driven Design, software design and Advanced TypeScript & Node.js best practices for large-scale applications.

View more in TypeScript

You may also enjoy...

A few more related articles

How to Handle Updates on Aggregates - Domain-Driven Design w/ TypeScript Domain-Driven Design

ddd typescript software design aggregate root aggregate sequelize

In this article, you'll learn approaches for handling aggregates on Aggregates in Domain-Driven Design.

Decoupling Logic with Domain Events [Guide] - Domain-Driven Design w/ TypeScript Domain-Driven Design

ddd typescript software design domain events sequelize typeorm

In this article, we'll walk through the process of using Domain Events to clean up how we decouple complex domain logic across the...

Does DDD Belong on the Frontend? - Domain-Driven Design w/ TypeScript Domain-Driven Design

ddd typescript software design frontend development

Should we utilize Domain-Driven Design principles and patterns in front-end applications? How far does domain modeling reach from ...

An Introduction to Domain-Driven Design - DDD w/ TypeScript Domain-Driven Design

ddd typescript software design

Domain-Driven Design is the approach to software development which enables us to translate complex problem domains into rich, expr...