My TypeScript Software Design & Architecture book just prelaunched! Check out solidbook.io.
Close

REST-first design is Imperative, DDD is Declarative [Comparison] - DDD w/ TypeScript

May 15th, 2019 / 11 min read / Share / Edit on GitHub
A comparison between designing Node.js applications using REST-first design and Domain-Driven Design.

This is part of the Domain-Driven Design w/ TypeScript & Node.js course. Check it out if you liked this post.

Also from the Domain-Driven Design with TypeScript series.

When you get a new Node.js project, what do you start coding first?

Do you start with the database schema?

Do you start with the RESTful API?

Do you start with the Models?

REST-first Design is a term I've been using it to describe the difference between what Domain-Driven Design projects and REST-first CRUD projects look like on a code level.

Just for reminders, REST stands for "Representational State Transfer", which is a architectural style towards designing APIs on the web with HTTP.

In this article, I'm going to explain what a REST-first Designed codebase looks like, how it's imperative and how it differs from a Domain-Driven Designed project.


Imperative vs. Declarative

Do we remember what imperative code is?

Imperative

You’ve probably written a lot of imperative code in your life, it’s usually the first thing we start out learning when we get into programming.

Imperative code is primarily concerned with "how" we do something. We need to be very explicit for how the program's state gets changed.

Find the max number in an array [Imperative]

Here's an example of how we would determine the max number in an array of numbers, imperative style.

const numbers = [1,2,3,4,5];
let max = -1;
for (let i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
  if (numbers[i] > max) {   
    max = numbers[i] 
  }
}

Because imperative programming requires you to specify the exact commands to specify "how" program state changes, in this example, we:

  • have a list of numbers
  • create a for loop starting at 0
  • increment i up to numbers.length
  • and if number at the current index is greater than the max, then we’ll set that as the max

I'm sure you know how to code 😊 but I figured I'd list out every step to be succinct that this is what we do with imperative code. We define the "how".

REST-first Design often ends up being imperative by nature. We'll look closer at that statement in a few moments.

Declarative

Declarative programming is more concerned about the “what”.

Because of this, declarative code is a bit more "wordy" and abstracts away a lot of the details for expressability.

Let's look at the same example.

Find the max number in an array [Declarative]

const numbers = [1,2,3,4,5]
const max = numbers.reduce((a,b) => Math.max(a,b))

Take particular notice of the language being used in this example.

Ask yourself,

"which of the two examples would non-programmers be quicker to understand?"

Notice that in this example, the language better describes the “what” than the imperative equivalent?

That’s the beauty of declarative programming. Code is much more readable and program intent is easier understood (if operations are appropriately named).

Declarative style code is one of the primary benefits of designing software using Domain-Driven Design.

Now that we're refreshed on Imperative and Declarative style coding, we'll dive deeper into my statements.

REST-first Design

When we build RESTful applications, we tend to think more about designing our applications from either:

  • the database up and
  • the API calls up

Because of this, there's a tendency to place the majority of our business logic in either controllers or services.

You might remember from Uncle Bob's "Clean Architecture", for controllers this is definitely no-no.

And if you read his book of the same name, you might recall the potential service-oriented fallacy of putting all the domain logic into services (hint: Anemic Domain Models).

But this is the type of code that gets written when:

  • we want to get something up and running quickly
  • we use a framework, such as Nest.js, holistically
  • we want to respond to prototype apps
  • we're working on small apps
  • we're working on problems that are either #1 or #2 from the Hard Software Problems

And it does suffice for a large number projects!

However, for complex domains with complicated business rules and policies, this has the potential to become incredibly difficult to change and extend as time goes on.

In REST-first CRUD applications, we almost solely write imperative code to satisfy business use cases. Let's take a look at what that looks like.

REST-first code

Let’s say we were working on an application where Customers could rent Movies.

Designing REST-first using Express.js and the Sequelize ORM, my code might look like this:

class MovieController {
  public async rentMovie (movieId: string, customerId: string) {
    // Sequelize ORM models
    const { Movie, Customer, RentedMovie, CustomerCharge } = this.models;

    // Get the raw orm records from Sequelize
    const movie = await Movie.findOne({ where: { movie_id: movieId }});
    const customer = await Customer.findOne({ where: { customer_id: customerId }});

    // 401 error if not found
    if (!!movie === false) {
      return this.notFound('Movie not found')
    }

    // 401 error if not found
    if (!!customer === false) {
      return this.notFound('Customer not found')
    }

    // Create a record which signified a movie was rented
    await RentedMovie.create({
      customer_id: customerId,
      movie_id: movieId
    });

    // Create a charge for this customer.
	  await CustomerCharge.create({
      amount: movie.rentPrice
    })

    return this.ok();
  }
}

In this code example, we pass in a movieId and a customerId, then pull out the appropriate Sequelize models that we know we’re going to need to use. We do a quick null check and then if both model instances are returned, we’ll create a RentedMovie and a CustomerCharge.

This is quick and dirty and it shows you just how quickly we can get things up and running REST-first.

But things start to get challenging as soon as we add business rules.

Business Rules in CRUD-first code

Let’s add some constraints to this. Consider that Customer isn't allowed to rent a movie if they:

A) have rented the maximum amount of movies at one time (3, but this is configurable)

B) have unpaid balances.

How exactly can we enforce this business logic?

A primitive approach would be to enforce it directly in our MovieController’s purchaseMovie method like so.

class MovieController extends BaseController {
  constructor (models) {
    super();
    this.models = models;
  }
  public async rentMovie () {
	const { req } = this;
    const { movieId } = req.params['movie'];
    const { customerId } = req.params['customer'];

    // We need to pull out one more model,
    // CustomerPayment
    const { 
      Movie, 
      Customer, 
      RentedMovie, 
      CustomerCharge, 
      CustomerPayment 
    } = this.models;

    const movie = await Movie.findOne({ where: { movie_id: movieId }});
    const customer = await Customer.findOne({ where: { customer_id: customerId }});

    if (!!movie === false) {
      return this.notFound('Movie not found')
    }

    if (!!customer === false) {
      return this.notFound('Customer not found')
    }

    // Get the number of movies that this user has rented
    const rentedMovies = await RentedMovie.findAll({ customer_id: customerId });
    const numberRentedMovies = rentedMovies.length;

    // Enforce the rule
    if (numberRentedMovies >= 3) {
      return this.fail('Customer already has the maxiumum number of rented movies');
    }

    // Get all the charges and payments so that we can 
    // determine if the user still owes money
    const charges = await CustomerCharge.findAll({ customer_id: customerId });
    const payments = await CustomerPayment.findAll({ customer_id: customerId });

    const chargeDollars = charges.reduce((previousCharge, nextCharge) => {
      return previousCharge.amount + nextCharge.amount;
    });

    const paymentDollars = payments.reduce((previousPayment, nextPayment) => {
      return previousPayment.amount + nextPayment.amount;
    })

    // Enforce the second business rule
    if (chargeDollars > paymentDollars) {
      return this.fail('Customer has outstanding balance unpaid');
    }

    // If all else is good, we can continue
    await RentedMovie.create({
      customer_id: customerId,
      movie_id: movieId
    });
    
    await CustomerCharge.create({
      amount: movie.rentPrice
    })

    return this.ok();
  }
}

There. It works. But there are several drawbacks.

Lack of encapsulation

Another developer could inadvertently circumvent our domain logic and business rules when developing a new feature that intersects with these rules, because it lives in a place where it shouldn’t be.

We could easily move this domain logic to a service. That would be a small improvement, but really, it’s just re-locating where the problem happens since other developers will still be able to write the code we just did, in a separate module, and circumvent the business rules.

_There are more reasons. If you'd like to know more about how services can get out of hand, read this.

There needs to be a single place to dictate what actions a Customer can do, and that’s the domain model.

Lack of discoverability

When you look at a class and it’s methods for the first time, it should accurately describe to you the capabilities and limitations of that class. When we co-locate the capabilities and rules of the Customer in an infrastructure concern (controllers), we lose some of that discoverability for what a Customer can do and when it’s allowed to do it.

Lack of flexibility

Most of the time, we’re concerned about making our application deliverable through HTTP.

For CRUD applications, yes- this is usually how we will be delivering it since the world lives on RESTful APIs.

However, if you want your application to be multi-platform, integrate with an older system or deliver your application as a desktop app as well, we'll need to ensure that none of the business logic lives in controllers, and instead resides within the Domain Layer.

We'll want to do that so that different infrastructure technologies can execute the use cases of the application.


Going back to how this code is imperative, it's imperative because we have to specify exactly "how" everything happens.

When we purchase a movie, we're writing code to insert into a junction table.

That's not very declarative.

CRUD-first design is a “Transaction Script” approach

In the enterprise software world, Martin Fowler would call this a Transaction Script (article coming soon).

I first came to knowledge of the term after skimming through Fowler’s Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture.

I also came to realize that the Transaction Script approach was the single approach I used to writing all of my backend code.

REST-first Design (more often than not) is a Transaction Script

How do we improve upon that? We use a domain model.

DDD

In Domain Modeling, one of the primary benefits is that we eventually hit an inflection point where the declarative language for specifying business rules becomes so expressive, that it takes us no time to add new capabilities and rules.

It also makes our business logic that much more readable, abstracting away how it gets done, and presenting more of what can get done and when it’s allowed to get done (that's not to say that the plumbing doesn't have to get laid).

If we were to take our previous example and look at it through DDD lenses, the controller code would probably look more like this:

class MovieController extends BaseController {
  private movieRepo: IMovieRepo;
  private customerRepo: ICustomerRepo;
  
  constructor (movieRepo: IMovieRepo, customerRepo: ICustomerRepo) {
    super();
    this.movieRepo = movieRepo;
    this.customerRepo = customerRepo;
  }

  public async rentMovie () {
    const { req, movieRepo, customerRepo } = this;
    const { movieId } = req.params['movie'];
    const { customerId } = req.params['customer'];

    const movie: Movie = await movieRepo.findById(movieId);
    const customer: Customer = await customerRepo.findById(customerId);

    if (!!movie === false) {
      return this.fail('Movie not found')
    }

    if (!!customer === false) {
      return this.fail('Customer not found')
    }

    // The declarative magic happens here.
    const rentMovieResult: Result<Customer> = customer.rentMovie(movie);

    if (rentMovieResult.isFailure) {
      return this.fail(rentMovieResult.error)
    } else {
      // if we were using the Unit of Work pattern, we wouldn't 
      // need to manually save the customer at the end of the request.
	  await customerRepo.save(customer);
      return this.ok();
    }
  }
}

See that? Notice how much is abstracted away?

From our controller, we no longer have to worry about:

  • if the Customer has more than the max number of rented movies
  • if the Customer has paid their bills
  • billing the Customer after they rent the movie.

In following articles on Domain Entities and Aggregate Roots, we'll go into more depth on how this works.

This is the Declarative essence of DDD. How it is done is abstracted, but the ubiquitous language being used effectively describes what the domain objects are allowed to do and when.

Additional reading

3 Categories of Hard Software Problems

This is part of the Domain-Driven Design w/ TypeScript & Node.js course. Check it out if you liked this post.



Discussion

Liked this? Sing it loud and proud 👨‍🎤.


0 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment

Submit

Stay in touch!



About the author

Khalil Stemmler

Khalil Stemmler is a Developer / Designer and co-founder of Univjobs. He frequently publishes articles about Domain-Driven Design and Advanced TypeScript & Node.js best practices for large-scale applications.



View more in Domain-Driven Design



You may also enjoy...

A few more related articles

An Introduction to Domain-Driven Design - DDD w/ TypeScript
Jul 30th, 2019 / 12 min read
Domain-Driven Design is the approach to software development which enables us to translate complex problem domains into rich, expr...
Handling Collections in Aggregates (0-to-Many, Many-to-Many) - Domain-Driven Design w/ TypeScript
Jul 25th, 2019 / 10 min read
In this article, we discuss how we can use a few CQS principles to handle unbounded 0-to-many or many-to-many collections in aggre...
Challenges in Aggregate Design #1 - Domain-Driven Design w/ TypeScript
Jul 25th, 2019 / 5 min read
In this series, we answer common questions in aggregate design. Here's an article orignating from the question, "How can a domain ...
How to Design & Persist Aggregates - Domain-Driven Design w/ TypeScript
Jul 24th, 2019 / 28 min read
In this article, you'll learn how identify the aggregate root and encapsulate a boundary around related entities. You'll also lear...

Want to be notified when new content comes out?

Join 2000+ other developers learning about Domain-Driven Design and Enterprise Node.js.

I won't spam ya. 🖖 Unsubscribe anytime.

Get updates